Prebiotics, Probiotics Provide Alternatives To Antibiotics
Summary: Although reports vary, scientific literature indicates prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics have use in aquaculture as alternatives to antibiotics. Channel catfish that received the prebiotic MOS had improved survival after bacterial challenge. Probiotics have been shown to protect against bacterial infections in rainbow trout and improve survival in catfish. Synbiotics also have potential for manipulating the microflora of the gut and improving growth and disease resistance in fish.
As aquaculture continues to expand, pressures to find alternatives to medicinal disease treatments are also rising. Concerns over antibiotic use in aquaculture include the development and transfer of antibiotic resistance to fish and human pathogens, as well as the potential for accumulation of residual antibiotics in aquaculture products.
As the demand for aquaculture products increases, so does the search for environmentally friendly alternatives to antibiotics. Alternatives to antibiotics include dietary prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics.
Prebiotics and probiotics have been shown to enhance both growth efficiency and disease resistance in a variety of aquatic species, while synbiotics (mixtures of pre- and probiotics) have yet to be extensively evaluated. Research using prebiotics and probiotics in aquaculture is growing, but the results are often inconsistent, and the mechanisms through which they function are poorly understood.
A prebiotic is a non-digestible substance that is thought to provide a beneficial effect on the host by stimulating growth or activity of naturally occurring bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. Typically, prebiotics are non-digestible carbohydrates (fructo-oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides, mannan-oligosaccharides), but can also include indigestible dietary fibers (dextrins, inulin, lignin, waxes, beta glucans).
Many forms of prebiotics have been fed to a wide variety of fish species with varying responses. For example, inulin has recently been shown to alter the intestinal microbial communities of turbot, Arctic char, Atlantic salmon and hybrid striped bass, but did not yield any benefits toward improving growth or feed efficiency.
Prebiotics like glucans have shown protection against enteric septicemia of catfish in channel catfish when the products are injected but not when fed. Furthermore, a prebiotic composed of brewer’s yeast, dairy components and dried fermentation products was found to significantly increase feed efficiency and reduce the mortality of hybrid striped bass challenged with bacterial pathogens.
Non-digestible oligosaccharides fed to rainbow trout, European seabass, channel catfish and hybrid striped bass have shown varying degrees of success in improving growth efficiency and resistance to disease.
The results of these studies suggested that prebiotics have a role in aquaculture as a feed additive for improving growth and resistance to disease.
Probiotics are live microorganisms thought to have a beneficial health effect on the host by adding “good” bacteria to the gut.
Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Enterococcus, Carnobacterium, Saccharomyces and Candida are probiotic organisms widely investigated in aquaculture. These organisms are added directly to the water environment of the fish or administered orally in feed.
Probiotics have been shown to protect against bacterial infections by Vibrio, Aeromonas, Yersinia and Ichthyophthirius in rainbow trout. In African catfish, Lactobacillus enhanced fish health, survival and growth performance. In channel catfish, Pediococcus and Entebacteria had no growth-promoting or immune-stimulating effect, while Bacillus bacteria were shown to increase the survival of pond raised catfish.
Another class of compounds called synbiotics includes mixtures of prebiotics and probiotics. Synbiotics may work by stimulating the growth of beneficial bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract of the host. The authors are not aware of any studies in aquatic animals that have evaluated the efficacy of these products, but synbiotics have potential for manipulating the microflora of the gut and improving growth and disease resistance.
At the Thad Cochran National Warmwater Aquaculture Center in Stoneville, Mississippi, USA, the authors examined a commercial mannan-oligosaccharide (MOS) available from Alltech, Inc. derived from the cell wall of yeast as a potential feed additive in channel catfish.
In one study, the catfish were fed the prebiotic at 2 g/kg diet for six weeks, then challenged with Edwardsiella ictaluri, the bacterium that causes enteric septicemia of catfish. All fish were bled before the challenge as well as on day 14 of the challenge. In a second study, catfish received the prebiotic at 4 g/kg diet for nine weeks, followed by challenge with E. ictaluri. Mortalities were collected for 21 days.
Gut morphology was examined in fish fed diets with mannan-oligosaccharide, as well as controls prior to challenge. Sections of the upper, middle and lower parts of the intestine were taken for analysis.
Feeding MOS at 2 or 4 g/kg diet for six or nine weeks did not improve weight gain, specific growth rate or feed conversion in the fish (Table 1). However, survival was significantly increased after challenge with E. ictaluri in both studies.
Plasma levels of lysozyme, an indicator of a non-specific immune response, were similar in fish fed MOS feed before and after challenge. Figure 1 shows representative lower intestine sections of fish fed MOS compared to controls. Microvilli lengths in the lower, middle and proximal intestine were similar after nine weeks of feeding.
Figure 1. The lower intestine of catfish fed a control diet showed microvilli lengths similar to those in the intestine of fish that received feed supplemented with the prebiotic mannanoligosaccharide.
Table 1. Culture performance of channel catfish fed an MOS-supplemented diet or control diet. Values with different letters within columns are significantly different (P < 0.05).
* Mean initial weight was 45.8 ± 1.2 and 10.3 ± 0.3 g/fish in studies I and II, respectively.
Source: Brian C. Peterson, Ph.D., Thad Cochran National Warmwater, Aquaculture Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776 USA – Natha J. Booth, Ph.D., Lester Khoo, VMD, Ph.D., Bruce B. Manning, Ph.D., Thad Cochran National Warmwater, Aquaculture Center. – Global Aquaculture Advocate – July/August 2010.